Analysis of the 2005 Tax Cuts

Since no-one else seemed to be doing it, I’ve analysed the 2005 tax cuts by household. Since inequality and poverty analysis is typically done at a household level, it is more informative to see how the benefits are distributed across households than across individuals. The main findings are:

  • The share of the tax cuts going to the richest 1% of households will be 3% in 2005-06 and 4% in 2006-07.
  • A greater share of the 2006-07 tax cuts will go to the richest 5% (19%) than to the poorest 50% (11%).
  • Middle-income taxpayers get substantially less than an even share of the tax cuts.

To download the analysis (4 page PDF file), click here.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Australian issues. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Analysis of the 2005 Tax Cuts

  1. Spog says:

    Well, it’s called Imagining Australia, so imagine this…

    We get a new tax system in which the bottom 50% of the income distribution pays no tax at all. Much rejoicing. Then we get tax cuts, and amazingly, no-one in the bottom 50% gets any. The tax cuts are quite obviously skewed toward the top end of town. Much irritation and bleating.

    I guess though, people might eventually twig that to get a tax cut, you have to pay tax.

    Enough of the flippancy.

    Andrew, can you explain how the bottom 50% can have tax cuts at all in the second year, given that the 15% scale comes in for 2005-06, and all the other cuts are high end incomes? The middle 20% doesn’t have an average income high enough to get tax cuts either, but those I can accept because it’s an average, so there must be some at the 30%/42% margin. That doesn’t seem to be the case for the bottom group though.

    Also, and back to my flippant point, I’d make a comment that I made earlier, that for single people, it’s almost impossible not to have a tax free threshold in excess of $10,000 a year. Couples are much more complex, but even there, at a household level they generally have a minimum tax free threshold of over $18,000. Given this, just how much tax cut would one expect to see going to the bottom end?

  2. Andrew Leigh says:

    Spog, I’ve taken a shot at answering your criticism in a new blog entry today. As to the bottom $10,000 group getting something in 2006-07, the simple explanation is that the 2006-07 tax cuts are a comparison with the 2004-05 tax laws, not the 2005-06 tax laws. Sorry – I should’ve made this clearer.

  3. rossco says:

    I have a problem with using household income for tax analysis purposes. We are taxed as individuals not as households. I have an income of $50 000+, my wife has income of $20000+ so we both get a $6 cut even though our household income is close to $80000. If we were taxed on household income we would get a much bigger cut (around double I think)

  4. Andrew Leigh says:

    Rossco, this was precisely the rationale for my analysis. The microdata I have includes information on both individual incomes and household incomes. So I can see how the tax cut affects each individual, and then aggregate that up to a household level.

Comments are closed.