Pro War Blogger Opposes Torture

Belatedly responding to John Quiggin’s call, I’d be happy to be counted among the ranks of pro-war bloggers opposed the use of torture. I’d regard myself as what the yanks call a "liberal hawk". So far as I’ve been able to discern, there are currently 3 Australians in this category – Michael Costello, Macgregor Duncan and myself. But if others wish out to "out" themselves, we’d be delighted to hear from you.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Iraq. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Pro War Blogger Opposes Torture

  1. avocadia says:

    I was then, but waver a bit these days.

  2. Mork says:

    I used to be, too, but when all the assumptions on which my pro-war position was based turned out to be false, I had no choice but to modify my views.

    Frankly, I now struggle to understand how I was so naive.

  3. Don says:

    A liberal hawk? What do you mean?

    Pro-war in general? Pro some war in particular (on Iraq, on terror, on North Korea, on France)?, pro war under certain circumstances?

  4. Andrew Leigh says:

    Don, I was tempted to say “pro-war in general”, but resisted the urge. That said, I think being pro-war in general is at least as defensible a position as being anti-war. (Do these people with “No War” bumper stickers on their cars really mean that they wouldn’t have fought WWII?)

    What I meant was that I share the view of Tony Blair, Bill Clinton and Jose Ramos Horta, among others, that military intervention to remove Saddam was a good thing. For an interesting (though now slightly dated) discussion by and about liberal hawks, see http://fray.slate.msn.com/id/2093620/entry/2093763/

  5. mr.lynch says:

    what do you think the advantages and disadvantages are of warfare? Just curious?

Comments are closed.