Ed Sector has put out a new report, purporting to show that in Illinois, students do worse if they have lower-quality teachers (as measured by the teachers’ average test scores, qualifications, etc). Unfortunately, while the conclusion seems sensible, I don’t trust the analysis. The measure of teacher quality is the average teacher quality at a school. And schools where teachers have lower qualifications are probably also places where students are poorer, have more problems at home, and so on. The right way to do this would be to look within a school, but the researchers clearly don’t have that data. This is one of those instances that illustrates how important teacher quality might be, and how hard it is to look at it properly.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
And it would be nice to have some more direct measures of quality than the input measures (well they’re not quite that but they’re pretty rough proxies) that you mention.
“This is one of those instances that illustrates how important teacher quality might be, and how hard it is to look at it properly.”
As a teacher, naive in economics, I welcome the questioning of this sort of analysis. Let’s clarify how teacher quality may be developed – and also be understood by all who seek to give opinions about it.
Surely the research quoted was a strawdog, full of political purpose but rather empty of significance for learning. And anyway, where are the Mathematics teachers going to come from? And so on.
While my working life has been based upon an assumption that “quality teaching” makes a difference, I look forward to more questioning about the connections between the Economics of Education, the Politics of Education and the Science of Education.