Was someone short on fact-checkers?

I generally assume that everyone knows how to use Wikipedia, but it seems not. From today’s Age:

Reports suggest that in the 19 American presidential elections between 1888 and 1960, the candidate with a height advantage won all but one.

As Wikipedia notes, between 1888 and 1960, Coolidge, McKinley (twice) and Harrison all beat their taller opponents.

More generally:

For the 47 elections in which the heights of both candidates are known, the taller candidate won 29 times (approximately 62% of the time), the shorter candidate won 15 times (approximately 32% of the time), and the candidates were the same height three times (about 6% of the time). If the scope of elections is restricted to 1900 and on, only 6 out of 28 elections were won by the shorter candidate.

Full table of US Presidential candidate heights here (and Canadian Prime Ministers here, but nothing for Australia – does anyone feel like creating one?).

Update: Regular reader Alistair Campbell takes up the challenge, posting a Google spreadsheet with heights for the PM and Opposition leader. Anyone with more information, please update it (I suspect there is much that is hidden in biographies).

About these ads
This entry was posted in Media. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Was someone short on fact-checkers?

  1. nfpsheppard says:

    Well Bob Hawke beat Malcolm Fraser for starters…

  2. Alistair Campbell says:

    I’ve been looking for a task for procrastination…..I’ll try and start one up at uni today…

  3. Alistair Campbell says:

    I have decided to add a couple more fields. Weight, age (I would assume already done before), eye colour….. All relatively pointless, but I would be interested to look at trends…. I don’t think too many people change their vote based on the eye colour of the candidates, but it is possible!

Comments are closed.