I do think it’s important to be clear about what should and shouldn’t be considered unacceptable at universities. Mac Uni’s Andrew Fraser is being shunted out not because he works on race and crime (as a casual reader of the SMH might assume), but because he hasn’t got solid facts to back up his allegations. He certainly doesn’t appear to have done any serious research on the issue. Were it otherwise, I for one might feel compelled to take the "I don’t agree with a bloody word you say, but I don’t reckon you should be sacked for working on controversial stuff" approach.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
That’s a slippery road you’re on. What about all those academics who are Marxists? Should we sack them? Why is it respectable to be a Marxist (even more respectable to be a ‘refomed’ Marxist) than a racist (who are normally just stupid)?
Taking the view that the wise man avoids temptation, so we should avoid hounding people for their beliefs.
Having an uninformed opinion without back up research and evidence is one thing and broadcasting it is another, especially when it may reflect poorly on your employer.
Only the unemployed allowed to have opinions now?
Agree with Benno.
It’s not about your opinions, but rather presenting ideas as having validity without having done the necessary research. I have all sorts of ideas, say in politics, but I wouldn’t present them with the imprimateur of being an Honorary Associate in the School of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of Sydney (which I am) without the necessary research – and it that case I would feel uncomfortable presenting it unless there was some connection to mathematics.
Unless Andrew Fraser can present the research underpinning his claims, he doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
Sinclair, does this mean you’re generally in favour of rigidity in the academic labour market? I would’ve thought you’d be opposed to a little more churning…..