Gerard Henderson thinks our politicians are in very good standing, and distrust is all in the vivid imaginations of our politicians. I beg to differ.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
Typical. Right after I’ve finish submitting a piece on political apathy to my Uni magazine, everyone in the media begins talking about it with all these useful quotes and claims. Ahh well.
The AEC had a good survey of young voters recently :
Report 1 – Enrolment and Voting
Report 2 – Youth, Political Engagement and Voting
The figures certainly dont agree with Hendersons rosey view.
Whether Henderson is right or not, I think polls like Morgan’s exaggerate the public’s disillusionment. For a start, they demand a too high standard. Pollies don’t always tell the truth, so it hard to say that they meet high standards of ethics and honesty. But most of them do most of the time so if you ask a less demanding question you get a more positive result. Also, asking about a large class of people lets people invoke stereotypes, which are relatively immune to empirical reality.
Compare for example questions in the AES with Morgan for 2004. 9% say that pollies have high or very high standards of ethics and honesty. Yet over at the AES 45% say ‘honest’ describes John Howard well, and that’s after a sustained campaign to paint him as a liar. 46% think trustworthy describes Howard. He has taken a battering – 58% thought he was honest in 1998. But only 7% that year thought pollies in general had high levels of ethics and honesty.
It’s a bit like the phenomenon you see studying prejudice – stereotypes that are not actually working assumptions in dealing with individual people.
Don’t trust me, I’m lousy at statistics, but I think the “people in government can be trusted” regression line is influenced too heavily by the 1969 (and possibly 1984) figure. Given how much the numbers fluctuate, (compare 1993 with 1995/6), I don’t think you could really draw a conclusion at all.
Andjam, if you throw away the 1969 and 1984 observations, you’re only left with the 1990s. And I agree with you that there’s no discernable trend during the 1990s.
I’m probably contradicting what I said at ACE – trust the government at what? When Howard says the government is doing all it can to prevent terrorism in Australia, I believe him. In fact, given what I read in the papers (and the sudden ALP obsession with the Magna Carta) some people are arguing the government is doing too much. Yet, when (if) Howard says to me Telstra is a good investment I don’t believe him.
I think people have nuanced view of trust and confidence in government that is not (necessarily) meaningfully captured in broad summary statistics.