Peter Martin (the holiday Gittins) has an article in today’s SMH arguing for simplifying our tax filing system. And I’m not just saying that because I get a footnote.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
It would be necessary to reform the family payments system first, or else most families with children – a sizeable group – would still have to put in tax returns. This is because for the purposes of the FTB income test families estimate their income in advance, and this gets reconciled through the tax returns at the end of the financial year. In the past this has lead to considerable overpayments, because families tend to underestimate their future incomes and it appears that family incomes are actually quite volatile. In more recent years, the number of overpayment has fallen, but it is still quite significant. The alternative would be to move the payments and their reconciliation back into the benefit system, as they were before ANTS, or to move to a Canadian-style system where tax credits are set on the basis of previous years financial income and remain basically unchanged during the financial year, and are then set for the next year on the basis of the current years income. It would also be possible to make the system universal, so that reconciliation was unnecessary, but this would be extremely expensive, if one wanted to avoid losers.
There is a discussion of some of this at http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/pdf/543.pdf