For anyone who flies regularly, the Economist’s truthful flight safety annoucement is a must-read.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
The bit about life jackets is not quite true – there’s at of at least one ditching of a wide-bodied aircraft where some people got to use the jackets – some details here. Though a lot drowned when they inflated their jackets before they escaped and were trapped, so maybe you would be better off without them.
economist = subscriber only. A blogger has reproduced it here:
http://www.andreaharner.com/archives/2006/09/fear_of_flying_welcome_aboard.html
Why wouldn’t anyone buy tickets if seats were rearfacing? Would it really make a difference in a plane where you’re not feeling acceleration except on takeoff, and don’t really notice the movement at all during the flight?
My husband has met one of the survivors of the flight derrida mentions (US consul in Mumbai at the time). I gather that was one of the few times lifejackets might have been useful – water not too cold, very close to shore (a few survivors swam in, rescuers swam out).
From this week’s Economist:
A relatively common accident is for airliners to overshoot a runway at realtively low speed and end up intact in water (think Mascot airport), and that life jackets have actually been of use in these circumstances.