A sensible piece in the NYT looks at the use of growth scores to track student performance. There are some inevitable problems with this: chief among them that changes are statistically more variable than levels, and changes are sensitive to how the test is normed. But these aren’t insurmountable, and at the very least, reporting both changes and levels to administrators and parents would be valuable.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
Andrew, a growth of N when starting at level L may not mean the same as a growth of N when starting at level L + M, plus there are other impacts on usual educational growth e.g. associated with puberty.
Reporting growth could be useful.
Not sure by what you mean by “…how the test is normed.” If US “standarized tests” are similar to what I know, then each US-wide standardized test would be put onto a single scale – I would guess that the 2007 standarized test would be put on the same scale as the 2006, and 2005, and 2004 standarized tests (and so on).
I like this line in the article: ‘Ms. Bolender said that many teachers question the reliability of the growth model data, calling it “voodoo math†because “you have to be a Ph.D. in statistics to even comprehend it.†‘
Ah, well, no – the concepts and mathematics involved in the reporting is probably extremely simple if it’s anything like what I work with.