…is the Liberty and Democracy Party’s response to a questionnaire from the Australian Christian Lobby.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
PJD on Turning Points PJD on Turning Points Clinton McMurray on Turning Points ChrisPer on Turning Points Daniel Waldenström on Turning Points Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Categories
- Australian issues
- Australian Politics
- Behavioural Economics
- Blogging
- Book launch stuff
- Books
- Coming Events
- Current Affairs
- Development Economics
- Eclectic Observations
- Econometrics
- Economics & Public Policy Course
- Economics for Government Course
- Economics Generally
- Economics of Education
- Economics of Elections
- Economics of National Security
- Economics of the Family
- Election
- Environmental Economics
- Film
- Finance
- Food and Drink
- From the Frontiers
- Games
- Global issues
- Health economics
- Indigenous Policy
- Inequality
- Interesting stuff
- Iraq
- Jobs
- Labour Economics
- Law
- Low Wage Work
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Prediction Markets
- Randomisation
- Religion
- Social Capital
- Sport
- Sports
- Tax
- Television
- Thinktanks
- Trade & Development
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- Universities
- Urban Economics
- US Politics
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- What I'm Reading
Meta
what’s so funny about the LDP? they make a lot of sense.
This is so funny about the LDP :)(particularly the first answer in each instance):
19. Advertising: The Australia Institute and family groups have raised concerns about the premature sexualisation of children through marketing, advertising, music videos and a range of other media. What actions would you take to protect childhood?
* The Australia Institute is a socialist organisation.
* Raising a child is the job of parents, not the government.
25. Industrial Relations: The loss of penalty rates for weekend or public holiday work threatens to erode family time, and intrudes on Sunday as a day of worship and rest. What would your Party do to safeguard family time?
* Nothing.
* Individuals should be free to decide how they spend their time.
* Work contracts are for workers and employers to decide on freely without government involvement.
they don’t beat around the bush, they are direct and upfront.
I thought most of the answers were fine — I don’t see whats wrong about being honest and nor do I see whats wrong about having some sort of ideology (cf. the crap we get from the major parties. Here’s some money for you vote). The only one I thought was off the mark was 19. I’m not sure why they felt obliged to remark on the Aus Institute rather than just offer their policy.
Why do you think The Greens refused to answer?
I venture that the entertainment would be found in the collision of two (completely?) opposing world views. I like to imagine the reaction of whatever bluenose had to receive, read and edit the answers sent in by the LDP…most amusing.
They are giving a principled answer, rather telling a special interest group what they want to hear.
It’s funny precisely because of this. Their answer was more likely to lose votes than gain them!
How I would have loved to fill in these surveys so honestly when I had to do them for the Liberal Party in 1998.
Yes, I saw that about a week ago when the ACL got in touch with me.
Ripping stuff I must say. As it happens I’ll get to spruik here in Solomon on the 20th of November at an ACL meet-the-candidate do.
Those responses have pretty much convinced me to vote LDP. I don’t like the abortion parts so much though, and there could be greater recognition of the problem of human trafficking (the position was fine, but could have been more emphatic on what is probably one of the greatest evils of our time).
“I venture that the entertainment would be found in the collision of two (completely?) opposing world views.”
I don’t think they (Christianity and Libertarianism) are “completely opposed” at all (at least, there seems to be some demographic crossover, especially in the ‘States).
They’re *politically* opposed however, in that the ACL sees almost no distinction between their values and what ought to be society’s values; there’s basically no “gap” which would otherwise be filled by an ideology of some kind. But that’s the same with basically every group which has no clear limit to its “nannying” tendencies.
Spot on, Leon.
‘I don’t think they (Christianity and Libertarianism) are “completely opposed†at all ‘
Nope, not necessarily any at all. In fact some of us think that God wants us to be politically libertarian. After all, virtue obliged is little virtue at all.
Which is why I agree with the substance of nearly every answer, except for the wishy-washy bits about ‘not taxing’ abortion (?! – er, LDP guy, the question was about banning!!).
The humour was in the LDP not playing the game. Normally parties try to pretend that their views are consistent with the questioners, and when that is impossible are almost apologetic about it. The LDP frankly told the questioners that they were wrong.
That was more or less lost on me: I had never read any questionnaires like that before until I checked out some of the others on that site. So I just found the “socialists” and “we’ll do nothing” comments funny.
By the way click on the “Full response” tab for a more reasoned answer.
I’m not sure who answered these, but im guessing from the Drollery that it was John Humphreys.
And I’m also guessing that pointed reference to the Australia Institute as “Socialists” is an attempt to wedge the christians against them 🙂
The LDP has a real chance of getting a Senator up in NSW due to our preference deals. We’d appreciate if anyone reading this could chip in $10 by signing this pledge:
http://www.pledgebank.com/donate4freedom
Even if you don’t agree with all our policies, a libertarian voice in parliament would provide balance.
“John Howard is not our mother….” – yes.