Just one more Dr Seuss story, or you’ll never get into Yale

Two new NBER working papers look at the  increasingly tough market to get into the best US colleges, and suggest that it may be having implications for high-schoolers, parents, and maybe even lil munchkins. (Both gated, sorry.)

Playing the Admissions Game: Student Reactions to Increasing College Competition
by John Bound, Brad Hershbein, Bridget Terry Long

Gaining entrance to a four-year college or university, particularly a selective institution, has become increasingly competitive over the last several decades. We document this phenomenon and show how it has varied across different parts of the student ability distribution and across region, with the most pronounced increases in competition being found among higher-ability students and in the Northeast.

Additionally, we explore how the college preparatory behavior of high school seniors has changed in response to the growth in competition.

We also discuss the theoretical implications of increased competition on longer-term measures of learning and achievement and attempt to test them empirically; the evidence and related literature, while limited, suggests little long-term benefit.

The Rug Rat Race
by Garey Ramey, Valerie A. Ramey

After three decades of decline, the amount of time spent by parents on childcare in the U.S. began to rise dramatically in the mid-1990s.

Moreover, the rise in childcare time was particularly pronounced among college-educated parents. Why would highly educated parents increase the amount of time they allocate to childcare at the same time that their own market returns have skyrocketed? After finding no empirical support for standard explanations, such as selection or income effects, we offer a new explanation. We argue that increased competition for college admissions may be an important source of these trends. The number of college-bound students has surged in recent years, coincident with the rise in time spent on childcare.

The resulting “cohort crowding” has led parents to compete more aggressively for college slots by spending increasing amounts of time on college preparation. Our theoretical model shows that, since college-educated parents have a comparative advantage in college preparation, rivalry leads them to increase preparation time by a greater amount than less-educated parents. We provide empirical support for our explanation with a comparison of trends between the U.S. and Canada, and a comparison across racial groups in the U.S.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Just one more Dr Seuss story, or you’ll never get into Yale

  1. ChrisPer says:

    Hm. If people’s market returns have skyrocketed, they and their partners are more free to take ‘non-cash-positive’ preferences such as investing one partner’s time in the children.

    THis describes the period my family were in education, and parents seemed to be pushing time and resources back to their kids education compared with previous times, just because everyone was.

    Apart from the structural changes eg manufactuiring sector employment in the last decade…

Comments are closed.